![Case Study – Running Cost Comparison Between a NAPR and an AYO WX HFM PAPR](https://aimwellbreathing.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/AYO-WX-Industrial-PAPR-P3-dust-protection-1080x675.jpg)
Case Study – Running Cost Comparison Between a NAPR and an AYO WX HFM PAPR
自吸式呼吸器的另一个特点是它可重复使用,从长远来看更节省成本,而且更环保。 因此,自吸式呼吸器的市场份额不断上升也就不足为奇了。
然而, 对于电动空气净化呼吸器 (PAPR),, especially tight-fitting PAPRs, apart from being elastomeric, they offer better protection by design, as the pressure inside the breathing zone is positive, and they are also more comfortable to breathe.
研究表明,2022 年 自吸式呼吸器 市场规模超过 95 亿美元,而 PAPR 市场规模为 24 亿美元。 假设平均 自吸式呼吸器为 每套50 美元,平均 PAPR 为 1000 美元(大致正确),这表明其比率为 79:1,这意味着对于 79 个 自吸式呼吸器用户,只有一个 PAPR 用户。 因此PAPR还有更大的增长空间。
In fact, the industry trend is heading for more workers to move up from NAPRs toward PAPRs for better protection. For example, in Australia, the exposure limit for welding fumes is reduced from 5mg/m3 to 1mg/m3, and this almost certainly will demand the use of PAPRs in many welding sites.
However, most PAPRs are much more expensive than NAPRs, and they are also bulky, heavy, and troublesome to use and maintain, and these are the key inhibitors of their adoption. Therefore, it is easy to comprehend that there are more users of NAPRs than PAPRs.
To allow widespread workers to be able to take advantage of the improved protection from PAPR technology, Aimwell invented, designed, and optimized AYO WX HFM Half-Face Mask PAPR System, and we believe it can not only significantly enhance respiratory protection, but can also cost less within 12 months of use compared with typical NAPRs when doing daily dusty work, such as stonework.
以下是我们的案例比较:
自吸式呼吸器参考对象:带有 2135 P2/P3 颗粒过滤器的 3M 6200。
Comparing PAPR: AYO WX HFM Half-Face Mask PAPR System with pleated pre-filter and PAPR P3 HEPA filter.
![blog post inserts - 6](https://aimwellbreathing.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AYO-WX-case-study-cost-scaled-1.jpg)
参考应用:石材
预计更换过滤器时间:
- 3M 2135 P2/P3 过滤器:每 5 天一次
- AYO WX 打褶预过滤器:每2 天一次。
- AYO WX主滤芯:每 20 天一次。
Result:
![comparison table](https://aimwellbreathing.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/comparison-table.jpg)
分析::
- At initial purchase, the 3M 6200/2135 system costs $70 versus $559 of AYO WX HFM PAPR.
- 由于2135颗粒过滤器的设计,没有可以廉价更换的预过滤器。 因此,每5个工作日就需要更换整对过滤器。
- In contrary, AYO WX HFM PAPR has a unique low-cost pleated pre-filter that can capture larger particles with reasonable dust-loading capacity and protect the HEPA filter. As a result, the HEPA filter can last longer while the pleated prefilter can be changed often at a very low cost.
- At 12 months of use, the total cost of use for AYO WX HFM PAPR is $1,163 versus $1,245 for the 3M 6200/2135 system.
其它考虑因素
- The above comparison is based on the RRP for one AYO WX HFM Half-face Mask PAPR System. For large organizations with higher order quantity, the unit price will be lower than the RRP, thus the ‘breakeven’ time will be shorter accordingly.
- Being a PAPR, AYO WX HFM PAPR is more comfortable to breathe, especially for long working hours.
- Being a PAPR, AYO WX HFM can tolerate some facial leaks, but being a NAPR, the protection of 3M 6200/2135 is highly sensitive to facial leaks.
- A non-clean-shaven person shall not use a NAPR. However, a person with a short beard may use AYO WX HFM PAPR and still achieve good protection even better than most loose-fitting PAPRs.
- With patented technology, AYO WX HFM PAPR achieves a great wearability similar to common NAPRs. This is dramatically different from most common PAPRs which are bulky and heavy, with poor mobility.
![powered-air-purifying-respirator-PAPR-300x300-1](https://aimwellbreathing.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/powered-air-purifying-respirator-PAPR-300x300-1.jpg)
For daily work in highly dusty environments, AYO WX HFM Half-Face Mask PAPR System can not only provide better and more reliable protection than a typical NAPR but also costs less after using for 1 year, in addition to being more comfortable to breathe, making AYO WX HFM PAPR a perfect upgrade from common NAPRs for many industrial respiratory protection applications.